Egberts webspace
Are you giving up control of your computer?

Copilot or Autopilot?

AI can help you write texts. This is an example. I asked Gemini to write a text about the disadvantages of Copilot in the Windows operating system

Created with Gemini from Google

It is understandable to have concerns about the increasing integration of AI into operating systems like Windows. The feeling that you are losing control over your own device is a common sentiment among users. Let’s explore this topic by looking at the arguments that are raised, from the idea of AI as spyware to the value of a system like Linux.

The Rise of AI in Windows and the Loss of User Control

When we talk about AI in Windows, we're mainly referring to features like Copilot, which is deeply integrated into the operating system. Microsoft markets Copilot as a helpful assistant that can summarize documents, write code, and answer questions using your personal files and browsing history. The core argument against this integration is that it takes away your freedom to make decisions about your own machine. For example, Copilot’s presence is tied to the operating system itself and cannot be easily removed or disabled without technical workarounds. This mandatory integration can feel like a violation of the user's autonomy, as you didn't explicitly ask for this feature when you bought the computer.

Another point of contention is the data collection aspect. For AI to function effectively, it needs to process vast amounts of data, much of which is your personal information. This leads to the perspective that this AI is essentially spyware. Your interactions, documents, and even your keystrokes could be used to train and improve the AI models. While Microsoft has privacy statements that explain how data is used, the sheer volume of data being collected and the lack of transparent, granular controls can leave users feeling exposed. The argument is that you pay for your computer and the Windows software, but your data is being used to build a product that is not yours and that you have no say in. The data, in this view, becomes a commodity for a corporation rather than a private asset.

This challenge is part of a larger trend where the ownership of a device is no longer about physical possession, but about control over its functions and data. When you buy a computer, you expect to have full control over the hardware and software. However, with an operating system like Windows, you’re essentially leasing a service. Updates are pushed automatically, and new features—like Copilot—are integrated without your explicit consent. This makes it difficult to argue that the computer is truly "yours," even after you have paid for it. This is a fundamental shift in the relationship between the user and their technology.

Linux as a Solution for Full Control

In contrast to this model, many users turn to Linux. Linux is an open-source operating system, which means its source code is publicly available. This allows anyone to inspect the code, modify it, and distribute their own version, or "distribution." The core philosophy of Linux is freedom and control. You have the ability to choose what software you install, how it is configured, and what data, if any, is sent to external servers.

In the Linux world, there is no single entity pushing mandatory updates or features. You are in control of your system. If you do not want an AI assistant, you simply do not install one. If you are concerned about your data, you can audit the code to see what it is doing or use a distribution that is known for its strong focus on privacy. This level of transparency and control is a powerful counter-argument to the Windows model.

Furthermore, Linux offers a wide range of distributions tailored to different needs, from beginner-friendly versions like Ubuntu to security-focused distributions like Tails. This choice gives users the power to build a system that aligns with their personal values and technical needs. The community-driven nature of Linux means that development is often guided by user needs rather than corporate profits.

In conclusion, the debate over AI in Windows versus the philosophy of Linux comes down to one core issue: control. Is your computer a tool that you fully own and control, or is it a device that is part of a larger ecosystem governed by a corporation? The decision to use one over the other often depends on how you answer that question.

What aspects of the Linux operating system are most appealing to you in terms of maintaining control over your computer?

Implementing AI into Windows comes exactly at the 'right' time. Instead of people being angry about having to do away with their old computers, Microsoft tells them what a great computer they now can buy: an AI computer! But of course it needs to be a new one!